Artigo para reflexão: Where do we go from here?
Escrito por Imprensa, postado em 31 dEurope/London dezembro dEurope/London 2008 
.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/opinon/2008/12/160_29990.html&usg=__6UDEFbeXqaiv8XbFyGfzvAtdNl8=&h=231&w=200&sz=10&hl=pt-BR&start=3&tbnid=4gAdh_hYpkqglM:&tbnh=108&tbnw=94&prev=/images%3Fq%3Drobert%2Bskidelsky%26gbv%3D2%26hl%3Dpt-BR)
By Robert Skidelsky
The markets have ruled for a third of a century, but it has all ended in tears. A return to selfish nationalism is possible. If we are to avoid this sombre outcome, we must find ways to rub the rough edges off globalisation.
Any great failure should force us to rethink. The present economic crisis is a great failure of the market system. As George Soros has rightly pointed out, “the salient feature of the current financial crisis is that it was not caused by some external shock like Opec… the crisis was generated by the system itself.” It originated in the US, the heart of the world’s financial system and the source of much of its financial innovation. That is why the crisis is global, and is indeed a crisis of globalisation.
There were three kinds of failure. The first, discussed by John Kay in this issue, was institutional: banks mutated from utilities into casinos. However, they did so because they, their regulators and the policymakers sitting on top of the regulators all succumbed to something called the “efficient market hypothesis”: the view that financial markets could not consistently mis-price assets and therefore needed little regulation. So the second failure was intellectual. The most astonishing admission was that of former Federal Reserve chairman Alan Greenspan in autumn 2008 that the Fed’s regime of monetary management had been based on a “flaw.” The “whole intellectual edifice,” he said, “collapsed in the summer of last year.” Behind the efficient market idea lay the intellectual failure of mainstream economics. It could neither predict nor explain the meltdown because nearly all economists believed that markets were self-correcting. As a consequence, economics itself was marginalised.
Leia mais em Prospect Magazine
